• Blog

  • About

  • Accolades

  • Recent Posts

  • Contact

  • More

    Use tab to navigate through the menu items.
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • May 2022 (1) 1 post
    • March 2022 (1) 1 post
    • February 2022 (4) 4 posts
    • January 2022 (4) 4 posts
    • December 2021 (1) 1 post
    • October 2021 (1) 1 post
    • August 2021 (3) 3 posts
    • July 2021 (1) 1 post
    • June 2021 (6) 6 posts
    • March 2021 (3) 3 posts
    • February 2021 (2) 2 posts
    • January 2021 (8) 8 posts
    • All Posts
    • Texas Appeals
    • Appeals
    • Mandamus
    Search
    Notice of Appeal Deadlines in a Pandemic – SA Lawyer Article by Justice Watkins
    Michael Ritter
    • Jun 6, 2021
    • 1 min

    Notice of Appeal Deadlines in a Pandemic – SA Lawyer Article by Justice Watkins

    For the current issue of the San Antonio Bar Association’s publication San Antonio Lawyer, Justice Beth Watkins published an article on extending deadlines for notices of appeal during the pandemic. For the full text of the article, please see above or visit the SA Lawyer webpage. (Published with Permission)
    8 views0 comments
    The 4th Court rules that changing the vinyl on a billboard sign doesn’t constitute a “mo
    Michael Ritter
    • Jun 2, 2021
    • 1 min

    The 4th Court rules that changing the vinyl on a billboard sign doesn’t constitute a “mo

    At issue in this appeal was whether changing the vinyl on a billboard sign constitutes a “modification” to a real property improvement under chapter 95 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Because the undisputed facts as depicted in this appellate record do not show that the billboard sign was “modified,” the 4th Court concluded that chapter 95 does not apply. Therefore, the court reversed the trial court’s judgment and remanded for further proceedings.
    4 views0 comments
    The 4th Court declines to rule that “hot taps” performed on gas pipelines are not inhere
    Michael Ritter
    • Jun 2, 2021
    • 1 min

    The 4th Court declines to rule that “hot taps” performed on gas pipelines are not inhere

    In an oil & gas case, the 4th Court declined to hold that “hot tapping” (a procedure by which a machine is used to cut into a gas pipeline while gas is still flowing through it) is not inherently dangerous as a matter of law. The court relied on the evidence admitted at trial showing hot taps were dangerous.
    2 views0 comments
    SPLIT DECISIONS – CRIMINAL LAW – CHILD PORNOGRAPHY: Romo v. State, 04-19-00772-CR
    Michael Ritter
    • Jun 2, 2021
    • 1 min

    SPLIT DECISIONS – CRIMINAL LAW – CHILD PORNOGRAPHY: Romo v. State, 04-19-00772-CR

    In a criminal case, the 4th Court held there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction for possession of child pornography. The majority held that the depictions of minors in a documentary about nudists were not “lewd” under the Texas Penal Code considering a variety of factors. The dissent would have held there was legally sufficient evidence showing the video’s depiction of minors was lewd.
    0 views0 comments
    SPLIT DECISIONS – COMMERCIAL LITIGATION – APPARENT AUTHORITY: San Antonio Federal Credit Union v. Ca
    Michael Ritter
    • Jun 2, 2021
    • 1 min

    SPLIT DECISIONS – COMMERCIAL LITIGATION – APPARENT AUTHORITY: San Antonio Federal Credit Union v. Ca

    In a commercial litigation case, the 4th Court affirmed a judgment rendered after a jury trial when, before trial, the trial court decided on cross-motions for summary judgment what contract controlled the parties’ dispute and instructed the jury accordingly at trial. Among other issues, the majority overruled a challenge to the summary judgment ruling that the employee who executed the contract for the Credit Union had apparent authority to bind the Credit Union. The dissent
    1 view0 comments
    4th Court’s May 2021 Cases – 35 Civil, 19 Criminal
    Michael Ritter
    • Jun 2, 2021
    • 1 min

    4th Court’s May 2021 Cases – 35 Civil, 19 Criminal

    In May 2021, the 4th Court issued opinions in 35 civil cases and 19 criminal cases. To see the full list of issued opinions or to read them, please visit http://www.search.txcourts.gov/DocketSrch.aspx?coa=coa04 May 5th (5 Civil & 3 Criminal) May 12th (8 Civil, 5 Criminal) May 19th (10 Civil, 4 Criminal) May 26th (12 Civil, 7 Criminal)
    1 view0 comments
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram

    © Michael J. Ritter

    DISCLAIMER

    The information provided on this blog is not legal advice, and is only general information.  Due to the timing of publishing blogs and the ever changing nature of the law, depending on the time you are reading a post, the information may not be the up-to-date legal information. Please see an attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.  No reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this blog without first seeking legal advice from an attorney in the relevant jurisdiction and subject matter. Access to this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the reader.