top of page

The 4th Court clarifies reversal and rendition is ordinarily proper when the evidence is legally ins

In In re JMT, the 4th Court issued a supplemental opinion on en banc review to overrule prior decisions in which panels had held the evidence was legally insufficient to support an order terminating parental rights, but reversed and remanded for a new trial without explanation. In JMT, the 4th Court clarified reversal and rendition of the judgment the trial court should have rendered must be the appellate disposition, unless the court expressly addresses the “interest of justice” exception and finds the case should be remanded.

 
 
 

Comments


  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

© Michael J. Ritter

DISCLAIMER

The information provided on this blog is not legal advice, and is only general information.  Due to the timing of publishing blogs and the ever changing nature of the law, depending on the time you are reading a post, the information may not be the up-to-date legal information. Please see an attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.  No reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this blog without first seeking legal advice from an attorney in the relevant jurisdiction and subject matter. Access to this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the reader.

bottom of page